Voice - Legal Education website
  • Home
  • Legal Context
    • Understanding the Australian Constitution >
      • What is a Constitution?
      • The Australian Constitution
      • Changing the Constitution
      • History of Referendums
    • Courts and the Constitution
    • Legal Language
  • The Voice
    • Overview of the Voice >
      • The Referendum Question & Proposed Constitutional Amendment
      • Design Principles
      • Law Council of Australia - FAQs
    • Legal Impact of the Voice >
      • Legal Analysis by the Experts
      • Solicitor-General's Opinion
    • History of the Voice >
      • The Dialogues
      • The Uluru Statement
  • Case for Yes
    • Understanding the Yes Case
    • The Yes Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on Yes >
      • Anderson - Addressing some Concerns about the Voice
      • Collins - Why the Voice Deserves Our Support
      • McIntyre - Be the Voice
  • Case for No
    • Understanding the No Case
    • The No Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on No >
      • The 'Progressive No' Case
  • Resources
    • Video Resources
    • Audio Resources
    • Expert Explainers >
      • EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet
      • EE2: Perche - How a Referendum Works
      • EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History
      • EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context
      • EE5: McDonald- Federalism and a First Nations Voice
      • EE6: Koch & Olijynk - The SA Voice
      • EE7: Jones - Lessons from Past Referendum
      • EE8 - Walker - The Impact of Foreign Money on the Referendum
    • Recommended Links
    • Digital Record
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Legal Literacy
    • About the Project Team
    • Supported by UniSA
    • Contact

What Will the Voice Look like?
​Key design principles have been released to help explain how Parliament intends to Legislate

Designing the Voice - Principles for Parliament

The Australian Government has committed to establish the Voice in accordance with a set of Design Principles, should the referendum be successful.
 
The wording of constitutional amendment is very deliberate in granting to Parliament the power to design and implement the Voice. That power is broad – it enables Parliament to make laws relating to:
  • the Voice’s composition, functions, powers and procedures; and
  • the way in which the Voice interacts with Parliament and the Executive, and those entities interact with it.
 
Parliament may amend or add to these laws as it sees fit (subject to normal democratic parliamentary processes), and with the input of the Voice once it is initially established.
It is for Parliament to decide what power the Voice has; what its procedures are, and how it is composed

The Design Principles

The First Nations Referendum Working Group is advising the Government on the referendum. That working group has agreed on a set of design principles of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. These Design  Principles have subsequently been endorsed by the Government, and provide guidance as to how the Voice will look and operate:

Function 
  • Design Principle 1: The Voice will give independent advice to the Parliament and Government

Composition
  • Design Principle 2: The Voice will be chosen by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people based on the wishes of local communities
  • Design Principle 3: The Voice will be representative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, gender balanced and include youth
Operation
  • Design Principle 4: The Voice will be empowering, community-led, inclusive, respectful and culturally informed
  • Design Principle 5: The Voice will be accountable and transparent
  • Design Principle 6: The Voice will work alongside existing organisations and traditional structures



Voice Design Principles

EXPLORING the Design Principles

The official Government Voice website contains a useful visualization of the Design Principles:
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

The Limits of the VOice

The Design Principles also make clear what the voice is NOT:
Picture
Picture

The Role of Parliament 

Ultimately, constitutional amendment proposal makes it clear that it is up to Parliament to determine the final design of the Voice. 

These Design Principles, however, provide a significant insight into how the Executive Government intends to design the Bill that will be put to Parliament to legislate. This provides a significant amount of detail for a amendment of this nature.

Further Resources

A copy of the Design Principles is available for download here:
Design Principles for the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Voice
File Size: 2596 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Picture

The Voice Legal Literacy Project

Supported by 
Picture
View the UniSA Privacy Statement
Authorised by Joe McIntyre, Voice Legal Literacy Project, UniSA: Justice & Society, University of South Australia, 224 Hindley Street, Adelaide, SA
  • Home
  • Legal Context
    • Understanding the Australian Constitution >
      • What is a Constitution?
      • The Australian Constitution
      • Changing the Constitution
      • History of Referendums
    • Courts and the Constitution
    • Legal Language
  • The Voice
    • Overview of the Voice >
      • The Referendum Question & Proposed Constitutional Amendment
      • Design Principles
      • Law Council of Australia - FAQs
    • Legal Impact of the Voice >
      • Legal Analysis by the Experts
      • Solicitor-General's Opinion
    • History of the Voice >
      • The Dialogues
      • The Uluru Statement
  • Case for Yes
    • Understanding the Yes Case
    • The Yes Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on Yes >
      • Anderson - Addressing some Concerns about the Voice
      • Collins - Why the Voice Deserves Our Support
      • McIntyre - Be the Voice
  • Case for No
    • Understanding the No Case
    • The No Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on No >
      • The 'Progressive No' Case
  • Resources
    • Video Resources
    • Audio Resources
    • Expert Explainers >
      • EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet
      • EE2: Perche - How a Referendum Works
      • EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History
      • EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context
      • EE5: McDonald- Federalism and a First Nations Voice
      • EE6: Koch & Olijynk - The SA Voice
      • EE7: Jones - Lessons from Past Referendum
      • EE8 - Walker - The Impact of Foreign Money on the Referendum
    • Recommended Links
    • Digital Record
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Legal Literacy
    • About the Project Team
    • Supported by UniSA
    • Contact