Voice - Legal Education website
  • Home
  • Legal Context
    • Understanding the Australian Constitution >
      • What is a Constitution?
      • The Australian Constitution
      • Changing the Constitution
      • History of Referendums
    • Courts and the Constitution
    • Legal Language
  • The Voice
    • Overview of the Voice >
      • The Referendum Question & Proposed Constitutional Amendment
      • Design Principles
      • Law Council of Australia - FAQs
    • Legal Impact of the Voice >
      • Legal Analysis by the Experts
      • Solicitor-General's Opinion
    • History of the Voice >
      • The Dialogues
      • The Uluru Statement
  • Case for Yes
    • Understanding the Yes Case
    • The Yes Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on Yes >
      • Anderson - Addressing some Concerns about the Voice
      • Collins - Why the Voice Deserves Our Support
      • McIntyre - Be the Voice
  • Case for No
    • Understanding the No Case
    • The No Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on No >
      • The 'Progressive No' Case
  • Resources
    • Video Resources
    • Audio Resources
    • Expert Explainers >
      • EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet
      • EE2: Perche - How a Referendum Works
      • EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History
      • EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context
      • EE5: McDonald- Federalism and a First Nations Voice
      • EE6: Koch & Olijynk - The SA Voice
      • EE7: Jones - Lessons from Past Referendum
      • EE8 - Walker - The Impact of Foreign Money on the Referendum
    • Recommended Links
    • Digital Record
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Legal Literacy
    • About the Project Team
    • Supported by UniSA
    • Contact

The Voice Referendum Legal Literacy project is a volunteer led community engagement and education project ​

About the PROJECT Team

The Voice Referendum Legal Literacy project is a volunteer led community engagement and education project convened by:
​
  • Associate Professor Joe McIntyre from the University of South Australia
  • Churchill Fellow, Jacqueline Charles
Technical support provided by Nick Clark and Thomas Sterle

No member of the project have any affiliation with either the 'Yes' or the 'No' Campaigns.
The convenors of this project both have a deep commitment to legal literacy and civics educations, which has informed and directed their earlier research and which has manifest itself in this project. 
Picture
Dr Joe McIntyre is an Associate Professor in Law at the University of South Australia, who specialises in public law. He is an expert in judicial studies - the study of courts and judges - and researches the relationships between courts and other public institutions. Part of his current research involves looking at 'pseudolaw', and the impact of misinformation and conspiracies in the public understanding of law. This research highlights the critical need for legal literacy in countering misinformation and deceptive practices in the public's engagement with the law and our legal institutions.
Picture
 Jackie Charles CF FRSA is a Churchill Fellow and Clerk of Chambers at Level 22 Chambers in Sydney. She is a leading expert in court education - explaining the role and significance of courts to the public. In 2019 she was awarded a Churchill Fellowship to research best practice in the design and delivery of court education programs. As a result of this research she has published a highly respected website on public court education: 
  • Court Education  Australia
We are deeply grateful for all the support and encouragement we have received from a wide range of sources in developing this project. 
  • In particular, we wish to acknowledge the support of the pseudonymous Twitter account  Australian Constitutional Law @ConstitLawAus who has provided detailed and extensive review of the content of the site.​

​We are always looking for additional team members to assist the project, whether in content creation or administration. If you are interested please email: Contact Us
Picture

The Voice Legal Literacy Project

Supported by 
Picture
View the UniSA Privacy Statement
Authorised by Joe McIntyre, Voice Legal Literacy Project, UniSA: Justice & Society, University of South Australia, 224 Hindley Street, Adelaide, SA
  • Home
  • Legal Context
    • Understanding the Australian Constitution >
      • What is a Constitution?
      • The Australian Constitution
      • Changing the Constitution
      • History of Referendums
    • Courts and the Constitution
    • Legal Language
  • The Voice
    • Overview of the Voice >
      • The Referendum Question & Proposed Constitutional Amendment
      • Design Principles
      • Law Council of Australia - FAQs
    • Legal Impact of the Voice >
      • Legal Analysis by the Experts
      • Solicitor-General's Opinion
    • History of the Voice >
      • The Dialogues
      • The Uluru Statement
  • Case for Yes
    • Understanding the Yes Case
    • The Yes Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on Yes >
      • Anderson - Addressing some Concerns about the Voice
      • Collins - Why the Voice Deserves Our Support
      • McIntyre - Be the Voice
  • Case for No
    • Understanding the No Case
    • The No Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on No >
      • The 'Progressive No' Case
  • Resources
    • Video Resources
    • Audio Resources
    • Expert Explainers >
      • EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet
      • EE2: Perche - How a Referendum Works
      • EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History
      • EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context
      • EE5: McDonald- Federalism and a First Nations Voice
      • EE6: Koch & Olijynk - The SA Voice
      • EE7: Jones - Lessons from Past Referendum
      • EE8 - Walker - The Impact of Foreign Money on the Referendum
    • Recommended Links
    • Digital Record
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Legal Literacy
    • About the Project Team
    • Supported by UniSA
    • Contact