Voice - Legal Education website
  • Home
  • Legal Context
    • Understanding the Australian Constitution >
      • What is a Constitution?
      • The Australian Constitution
      • Changing the Constitution
      • History of Referendums
    • Courts and the Constitution
    • Legal Language
  • The Voice
    • Overview of the Voice >
      • The Referendum Question & Proposed Constitutional Amendment
      • Design Principles
      • Law Council of Australia - FAQs
    • Legal Impact of the Voice >
      • Legal Analysis by the Experts
      • Solicitor-General's Opinion
    • History of the Voice >
      • The Dialogues
      • The Uluru Statement
  • Case for Yes
    • Understanding the Yes Case
    • The Yes Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on Yes >
      • Anderson - Addressing some Concerns about the Voice
      • Collins - Why the Voice Deserves Our Support
      • McIntyre - Be the Voice
  • Case for No
    • Understanding the No Case
    • The No Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on No >
      • The 'Progressive No' Case
  • Resources
    • Video Resources
    • Audio Resources
    • Expert Explainers >
      • EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet
      • EE2: Perche - How a Referendum Works
      • EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History
      • EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context
      • EE5: McDonald- Federalism and a First Nations Voice
      • EE6: Koch & Olijynk - The SA Voice
      • EE7: Jones - Lessons from Past Referendum
      • EE8 - Walker - The Impact of Foreign Money on the Referendum
    • Recommended Links
    • Digital Record
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Legal Literacy
    • About the Project Team
    • Supported by UniSA
    • Contact

Sometimes the best way to learn about something is to ask the expert

Expert Explainers

Sometimes the best way to learn about something is to ask the expert. At the Voice Legal Literacy Project, we are lucky to have many friends and colleague who support the project and the ideals its stands for, and have been willing to write contributions to help people understand some of the many complex issues involved in the referendum. 

The Expert Explainer resources have been developed to provide expert clarification and explanations so that 

Picture
Professor Anne Twomey (University of Sydney)
This Explainer looks at the significance and history of the Yes/No Pamphlets, and at their (loose) relationship to truth and accuracy
+ EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet

Picture
Dr Diana Perche (UNSW)
This Explainer looks at the mechanics of how a referendum works, and then explores the nature and significance of the 1967 referendum
+ EE2: Perce - How a Referendum Works

Picture
Picture
​Associate Professor Sean Brennan & Professor Gabrielle Appleby (UNSW Sydney)
This Explainer - from two legal academics closely involved in that process - examines the history of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, from the initial steps through the Dialouges through to its final creation 
+ EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History

Picture
Associate Professor Alison Holland (Macquarie University)
This Explainer looks at the history of the previous national Indigenous representative bodies - including ASIC - and explores the implications of that history for the Voice
+ EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context

Picture
Stephen McDonald SC  (Hanson Chambers)
The following Expert Explainer looks at the implications from Australia's federal nature for the Voice and its operation, as explained by a leading constitutional law expert. ​
+EE 5: FEDERALISM AND A FIRST NATIONS VOICE

Picture
Cornelia Koch and Dr Anna Olijynk (University of Adelaide)

​This Explainer looks at the newly established South Australian Voice, and examines its implications for the federal referendum ​
Picture
+ EE6: Koch & Olijnk - The Sa Voice & Its Implications
Picture

The Voice Legal Literacy Project

Supported by 
Picture
View the UniSA Privacy Statement
Authorised by Joe McIntyre, Voice Legal Literacy Project, UniSA: Justice & Society, University of South Australia, 224 Hindley Street, Adelaide, SA
  • Home
  • Legal Context
    • Understanding the Australian Constitution >
      • What is a Constitution?
      • The Australian Constitution
      • Changing the Constitution
      • History of Referendums
    • Courts and the Constitution
    • Legal Language
  • The Voice
    • Overview of the Voice >
      • The Referendum Question & Proposed Constitutional Amendment
      • Design Principles
      • Law Council of Australia - FAQs
    • Legal Impact of the Voice >
      • Legal Analysis by the Experts
      • Solicitor-General's Opinion
    • History of the Voice >
      • The Dialogues
      • The Uluru Statement
  • Case for Yes
    • Understanding the Yes Case
    • The Yes Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on Yes >
      • Anderson - Addressing some Concerns about the Voice
      • Collins - Why the Voice Deserves Our Support
      • McIntyre - Be the Voice
  • Case for No
    • Understanding the No Case
    • The No Pamphlet
    • Resources and Opinions on No >
      • The 'Progressive No' Case
  • Resources
    • Video Resources
    • Audio Resources
    • Expert Explainers >
      • EE1: Twomey - The Yes/No Pamphlet
      • EE2: Perche - How a Referendum Works
      • EE3: Brennan & Appleby - The Uluru Statement History
      • EE4: Holland- Representative bodies in historical context
      • EE5: McDonald- Federalism and a First Nations Voice
      • EE6: Koch & Olijynk - The SA Voice
      • EE7: Jones - Lessons from Past Referendum
      • EE8 - Walker - The Impact of Foreign Money on the Referendum
    • Recommended Links
    • Digital Record
  • About
    • About the Project
    • Legal Literacy
    • About the Project Team
    • Supported by UniSA
    • Contact